Pages

Saturday, May 21, 2011

What I Do With English

Today, I received my BA in English from UC Berkeley. I was selected to speak at the English Department's commencement; this is the speech that I gave.

*

When I tell people I’m an English major, the most common response is, “What are you going to do with that?” It’s one of my least favorite questions, but I’ve come to realize that it’s an important one. What are we going to do with English? What have we been doing with it, or in the name of it, in the years we’ve spent as part of Berkeley’s English department?

To most people, all that English majors do is read books, talk about books, and write papers about books. As a result, we don’t seem to be doing very much. But I, for one, value English precisely for its focus on the process of literary analysis. We rarely ask questions that have concrete answers, so our field of study is not defined by the results it produces, but by the practices that help us arrive at our conclusions. No matter what you’re going on to “do” with English, I believe there is value in having learned how to read, how to talk, and how to write like an English major.

English majors read differently from almost every other person I know: we re-read, partly out of necessity, but almost equally out of desire. The second reading is when the words that captivated at the level of story-telling begin to connect to each other across the lines of a poem, or the pages of a novel. Things begin to stand out: a phrase repeated, or not; a pattern, a symbol, a sign. Slowly, something like meaning begins to emerge, simply because we have taken the time to look for it. The pleasure and the danger of this sort of reading is that there is no limit to the number of times that a text can be read. For an English major, reading is never actually finished, only temporarily abandoned, to be reassumed whenever the book is opened again. I think there’s something deeply admirable about this kind of re-reading. After all, a willingness to re-read is also always a willingness to question—and perhaps even counter—first impressions. If English is about the process of re-reading, then it’s also about being continually open to new information, even if that information forces you to change your mind.

The same process of self-questioning is at work when we talk as English majors about the things we read. Looking back on my time spent at Berkeley, it strikes me that so much of my education has been accomplished through informed conversation with professors and with peers, working in tandem to explain, defend, and question our differing perspectives. The purpose of these conversations is not to argue until a single perspective emerges victorious, but rather to strengthen and sharpen all perspectives. In a world increasingly rife with violence that stems from the failure to consider alternate points of view, I believe we need more people who think—and who talk—like English majors. We need more people who are willing to have their opinions swayed by a reasoned discussion, just as we need more communities willing to support this kind of conversation.

As students of English, we’ve learned more than just a specialized vocabulary for talking about the things we read. We’ve learned the importance of continually interrogating our own practices and those of others with the aim of making them better. In the process, we’ve developed the kind of mental flexibility that allows us to think with others, even if we don’t always arrive at an agreement.

So, what are we going to do with that? If you ask me, we’re going to do a lot. Whatever professions we find ourselves pursuing—wherever we live and work, whatever we come to love—we will bring with us a willingness to revise our own assumptions and an openness to the ideas of others. We will model a way of thinking, and ultimately a way of living, that values process over products and individuality over conformity. And we will become integral members of multiple communities, including those that our unique outlook has allowed us to create.

*

I might not actually belong to multiple communities yet. But I sure as hell belong to this one:

10 comments:

  1. A very nice speech!

    One of the most valuable things we can gain from time spent in college is not specific training in a field of study, or a prestigious or original research project, but the training and sharpening of our minds. College is a place were the experience we acquire in the action of learning, analyzing, and creating is just as valuable as the finished product (if, as you very aptly point out, there is such a thing as a 'finished' product).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lovely speech, m'dear. :) Congratulations on graduating. In defending English as a worthwhile discipline to the various people who question it, I've also put forth similar arguments. One question about that: Where do you think this "mental flexibility" and "openness to revising one's own assumptions" is most visibly on exhibit, outside the classroom? By this reasoning, English majors -- or at least a significant portion of that crowd -- should be some of the nicest durned people in all of academics, and beyond. However, is this borne out by reality? If it is, do we not often see it because many of the effects of such an education aren't visible to the public eye? Thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Danica: That's an awfully good set of questions, and ones that are obviously difficult to answer. I would like to say that the people who are English majors but not nice just didn't learn what they needed to in college, or forgot it since, but that seems simplistic.

    I think part of the problem is that what I have so lovingly extolled as a willingness to change one's mind is so frequently denigrated as "flip-flopping." We live in a culture that doesn't generally celebrate the value of open-mindedness, because it seems to be at odds with possessing an unwavering personal belief. We have come to equate being "individual" with being unswayable by others, but we forget that perhaps no one is unswayed, and that being an individual is more about exerting choice in terms of who you allow to persuade you than it is about not being persuaded at all.

    I think there are fewer people like that because it's hard. We start out with fresh and unfilled minds, and so the first few times we're in a position to have to empty out and replace everything we know, the work isn't so hard. But over the years, stuff accumulates, theories that we believe in and think through, until we refuse to go through it all and clean things out. We get comfortable with a certain point of view, and we're less likely to change, even if we are presented with compelling reasons for doing so. We start developing a kind of unquestioned mental furniture around which every new idea must fit.

    Frankly, this constant self-questioning and reevaluating is tiring. And there's a point where most people say, "No, I don't want to do it anymore." Some people reach that point earlier than others.

    I think the real skill to hope for as a professor of literature is the ability to foster and grow the ideas of others, even if they are counter to your ideas. I still remember disagreeing with Professor Picciotto about something Milton-related in office hours, and while she said she thought my point wasn't relevant to the interpretive framework she was developing, she also said that someone else in the department had written a book that I might agree with, and told me to go read it. I don't even remember what that disagreement was over, now, but I'll never forget the way she dealt with it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hate this question a lot too because the answers are almost always not understood but I am a Philosophy major. What do I do? I learn to think, which nowadays it seems so necessary...
    Congrats on you graduation (:

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is that picture the entire graduating class of English BA's at Berkeley this year?

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Charles Schwartz Not by a long shot! Berkeley's English department is huge. These are just some of the students from my honors thesis class, hanging out together at the reception.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Congratulations, Candace. I was asked the same question years ago: What are you going to do with an Italian major besides understanding a libretto at the opera house?

    English is a lifetime commitment because, as many foreigners have told me, it's the most difficult language to learn. You can craft your thoughts more accurately in English than, say French or...Italian. Maybe that's why it's remained the lingua franca for quite a while? Keep on keeping on and keep spreading your love of English wherever you go. God only knows our nation sorely lacks it right now.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1. You answered your own question with "a lot." This is what you did after all that writing.
    2. A lot of what you said could be replaced with any other major, or just a college degree in general. Let's take your second to last paragraph. Scratch that first sentence as it is specific to English majors, and imagine a Chemistry major wrote that paragraph. It still holds true. The whole point of college is to learn more about the world and society, and to learn to think from a different perspective (esp. for those who choose a major they love, not b/c they can get a job out of it).

    That is not to say I hate English majors or you or anything like that. Your response to Danaica, for example, was an intelligent, interesting response. I just don't think this speech is particularly interesting or enlightening. It simply isn't at the caliber of a UC Berkeley English major.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ...you just became one of my heroes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Sharky: Glad to hear it! I went four years trying to find someone else who could articulate why what I did mattered...and when, at some point, I realized that no one would do it for me, I figured it was about time to do it myself.

    ReplyDelete